Showing posts with label US Debt Deficit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Debt Deficit. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Global Debt - update


Updated list of global debt -- the debt-financial fraud was going on from the AD beginning -- they have conquered the world after 1000 years using debt fraud and financial markets.

1. Ireland - 1,305%
External debt (as % of GDP): 1,305%
Gross external debt: $2.25 trillion
2009 GDP (est): $172.5 billion
External debt per capita: $535,529

2. United Kingdom - 428.8%
External debt (as % of GDP): 428.8%
Gross external debt: $9.12 trillion
2009 GDP (est): $2.128 trillion
External debt per capita: $149,281

3. Switzerland - 378.6%
External debt (as % of GDP): 378.6%
Gross external debt: $1.191 trillion (2009 Q3)
2009 GDP (est): $314.7 billion
External debt per capita: $156,694

4. Netherlands - 369.6%
External debt (as % of GDP): 369.6%
Gross external debt: $2.44 trillion
2009 GDP (est): $660 billion
External debt per capita: $145,928

5. Belgium - 326.7%
External debt (as % of GDP): 326.7%
Gross external debt: $1.253 trillion
2009 GDP (est): $383.4 billion
External debt per capita: $120,267

6. Denmark - 307.3%
External debt (as % of GDP): 307.3%
Gross external debt: $607.818 billion
2009 GDP (est): $197.8 billion
External debt per capita: $110,502

7. Sweden - 269.7%
External debt (as % of GDP): 269.7%
Gross external debt: $893.86 billion
2009 GDP (est): $331.4 billion
External debt per capita: $98,664

8. Austria - 251.4%
External debt (as % of GDP): 251.4%
Gross external debt: $809.2 billion
2009 GDP (est): $321.8 billion
External debt per capita: $98,554

9. France - 244.3%
External debt (as % of GDP): 244.3%
Gross external debt: $5.23 trillion
2009 GDP (est): $2.09 trillion
External debt per capita: $79,982

10. Portugal - 231.2%
External debt (as % of GDP): 231.2%
Gross external debt: $537.85 billion
2009 GDP (est): $232.6 billion
External debt per capita: $50,230

11. Hong Kong - 224.7%
External debt (as % of GDP): 224.7%
Gross external debt: $678.29 billion
2009 GDP (est): $301.8 billion
External debt per capita: $96,142

12. Finland - 215%
External debt (as % of GDP): 215%
Gross external debt: $383.7 billion
2009 GDP (est): $178.8 billion
External debt per capita: $73,082

13. Norway - 208.8%
External debt (as % of GDP): 208.8%
Gross external debt: $558.4 billion
2009 GDP (est): $267.4 billion
External debt per capita: $119,805

14. Spain - 176.9%
External debt (as % of GDP): 176.9%
Gross external debt: $2.40 trillion
2009 GDP (est): $1.36 trillion
External debt per capita: $59,459

15. Germany - 176.8%
External debt (as % of GDP): 176.8%
Gross external debt: $4.97 trillion
2009 GDP (est): $2.81 trillion
External debt per capita: $60,357

16. Greece - 167.2%
External debt (as % of GDP): 167.2%
Gross external debt: $557.4 billion
2009 GDP (est): $333.4 billion
External debt per capita: $51,916

17. Italy - 141.3%
External debt (as % of GDP): 141.3%
Gross external debt: $2.456 trillion
2009 GDP (est): $1.74 trillion
External debt per capita: $42,267

18. Australia - 121.9%
External debt (as % of GDP): 121.9%
Gross external debt: $1.037 trillion
2009 GDP (est): $851.1 billion
External debt per capita: $48,787

19. Hungary - 120.6%
External debt (as % of GDP): 120.6%
Gross external debt: $224.36 billion
2009 GDP (est): $186 billion
External debt per capita: $22,650

20. United States - 98.4%
External debt (as % of GDP): 98.4%
Gross external debt: $13.92 trillion
2009 GDP (est): $14.14 trillion
External debt per capita: $45,302

http://www.cnbc.com/id/30308959?slide=21

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Bush Tax-cut = GREED, Corruption, Fraud







“Restlessness and discontent are
the first necessities of progress.”--Thomas Edison







http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html

How can anyone be so indifferent and deceptive
at the face of "Fraud" and "Scams"

-- only those who are brainwashed and lunacy of the grand scam.







http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/12/chicken_crap_by_the_numbers.html

http://www.examiner.com/populist-in-national/boehner-chicken-crap-video







How can anyone be so indifferent and deceptive
at the face of "Fraud" and "Scams"

-- only those who are brainwashed and lunacy of the grand scam.





Monday, December 6, 2010

Fed Bernanke 60min 2








(CBS) Friday's unemployment number was a troubling surprise -up from 9.6 percent to 9.8 percent. The economists who decide such things say the recession ended in 2009.

But this is the worst recovery the nation has ever seen. Ben Bernanke is concerned. As chairman of the Federal Reserve, Bernanke has enormous power over the world economy. And he has used that power in ways that the world has never seen.

During the panic of 2008, he committed trillions of dollars to rescue the financial system. And the Fed dropped interest rates nearly to zero.

Now, in a new move that has become controversial, Bernanke intends to commit another $600 billion to hold down interest rates.

Chairmen of the Fed rarely do interviews. But this week, Bernanke feels he has to speak out because he believes his critics may not understand how much trouble the economy is in. We wanted to know whether we're headed for another recession, whether Congress should extend the Bush tax cuts.

But first we wanted to talk about unemployment which has been at 9.5 percent or more for 16 months.


Interview with Ben Bernanke
On "60 Minutes" this week, Scott Pelley interviewed Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, discussing a wide range of economic issues. "60 Minutes Overtime" presents unaired excerpts from that interview.


Chairman Ben Bernanke: The unemployment rate is just not going down. Unemployment is just about the same as it was in mid-2009, when the economy started growing. So, that's a major concern. And it looks that at current rates, that it may take some years before the unemployment rate is back down to more normal levels.

Scott Pelley: We lost about eight million jobs from the peak. And I wonder how many years you think it will be before we get all those jobs back?

Bernanke: Well, you're absolutely right. Between the peak and the end of last year, we lost eight and a half million jobs. We've only gotten about a million of them back so far. And that doesn't even account the new people coming into the labor force. At the rate we're going, it could be four, five years before we are back to a more normal unemployment rate. Somewhere in the vicinity of say five or six percent.

Four or five years. And Bernanke told "60 Minutes" something else that makes that even more painful.

Bernanke: The other aspect of the unemployment rate that really concerns me is that more than 40 percent of the unemployed have been unemployed for six months or more. And that's unusually high. And people who are unemployed for such a long time, their skills erode. Their attachment to the labor force diminishes and it may be a very, very long time before they find themselves back in a normal working position.

Bernanke was appointed in 2006 by President Bush and reappointed by President Obama. He grew up in Dillon, S.C., the son of a drugstore owner. He studied economics at Harvard and MIT and chaired the economics department at Princeton.

Pelley met Bernanke Tuesday (Nov. 30) in the Thompson Library on the campus of The Ohio State University. He was in Columbus on one of his frequent trips to hear how people are coping with the economy.

Earlier in the day he heard from the CEOs of Ford and IBM but also from small business owners who told him they were having trouble getting financing from banks.

Pelley: The major banks are racking up profits in the billions. Wall Street bonuses are climbing back up to where they were. And yet, lending to small businesses actually declined in the third quarter. Why is that?

Bernanke: A lot of small businesses are not seeking credit, because, you know, because their business is not doing well, because the economy is slow. Others are not qualifying for credit, maybe because the value of their property has gone down. But some also can't meet the terms and conditions that banks are setting.

Pelley: Is this a case of banks that were eager to take risks that ruin the economy being now unwilling to take risks to support the recovery?

Bernanke: We want them to take risks, but not excessive risks. We want to go for a happy medium. And I think banks are back in the business of lending. But they have not yet come back to the level of confidence that, or overconfidence, that they had prior to the crisis we want to have an appropriate balance.

Bernanke's first interview ever as Fed chairman came in 2009 shortly after the panic.

It was then that he gave "60 Minutes" and Scott Pelley a rare opportunity to see the Federal Reserve headquarters in Washington, D.C.

Last month, Bernanke announced the Fed's intent to buy $600 billion in U.S. Treasury securities, which is supposed to have the effect of lowering rates on long term loans for things like cars and homes.

Bernanke wanted to emphasize that these are the Fed's own reserves. It's not tax money. It does not add to the federal deficit.


Bernanke: It has to do with two aspects. The first is unemployment. The other concern I should mention is that inflation is very, very low, which you think is a good thing and normally is a good thing. But we're getting awfully close to the range where prices would actually start falling.



http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/05/news/economy/ben_bernanke_60_minutes/index.htm?iid=RNM

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/12/03/60minutes/main7114229.shtml?tag=contentMain;cbsCarousel







Bernanke turns obfuscatory

Dec 6, 2010 10:24 EST Felix Salmon


When Ben Bernanke appeared on “60 Minutes” in March 2009, he was immediately embraced by middle America and overnight became considered the foremost explainer of economic concepts to the nation. This time around, Bernanke’s much more embattled. And his answers are much less clear, much more political, and much more contentious. This is not how impartial technocrats should speak:

One myth that’s out there is that what we’re doing is printing money. We’re not printing money. The amount of currency in circulation is not changing. The money supply is not changing in any significant way.

Yes, Ben, you are printing money. It’s how you pay for those Treasury bonds you’re buying. Greg Ip says so, and so does Scott Grannis, who helpfully provides this chart from the first round of QE:

Base weekly 97.jpg

Look at the y-axis, and you’ll see that $600 billion is a lot of money, even if it’s less than we saw in QE1. Clearly the monetary base is changing in a significant way.

Bernanke continued with this:

Pelley: Can you act quickly enough to prevent inflation from getting out of control?

Bernanke: We could raise interest rates in 15 minutes if we have to. So, there really is no problem with raising rates, tightening monetary policy, slowing the economy, reducing inflation, at the appropriate time. Now, that time is not now.

Pelley: You have what degree of confidence in your ability to control this?

Bernanke: One hundred percent.

Bernanke’s first response doesn’t actually answer Pelley’s question: Pelley didn’t ask how long it would take to raise interest rates, he asked how long it would take to get inflation under control. Obviously, it would take longer than 15 minutes. How much longer, Bernanke doesn’t say. (And, sadly, Pelley doesn’t push him.)

And Bernanke’s second response is a lie. Or if it isn’t, he should be fired immediately. No central bank governor can or should ever have 100% confidence in anything: only a psychopath who will never change his mind can say that. The Fed’s ability to control inflation is a dark and mysterious thing; it’s not some kind of iron-clad law of physics.

BBernanke knows that he has friends at “60 Minutes”, and indeed they let him run down his talking points, giving no pushback along the way. He wouldn’t get away with this kind of performance if he started giving Trichet-style press conferences. Which is one reason I suspect that’s not going to happen.

http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/12/06/bernanke-turns-obfuscatory/


http://oi51.tinypic.com/4idag7.jpg




Wednesday, November 10, 2010

11/8-10/2010 Fed Bernanke vs Americans

Fed Greenspan comment on "Fraud". The fact is that I was fraudulently deceived by the Fed Reserve fraudulently disguising as if it is a government entity, for example. Also millions of Americans are deceived, but it is their choice if they want to remain silent about the reality that our nation is going bankrupt due to the fraudulent activities, schemes, and scams. The Fed Reserve is owned by private banks -- Fraudulently deceiving public until now that Americans are discovering facts.


Americans are robbed, bankrupted and USA is going bankrupted. What will be the next? Only naive Americans would believe in market hype, Bernanke scheme/scam, Obama misleading statements.

All faith is manipulated, and the reality is that people is being robbed and killed because of Greed.

Christian areas targeted in Baghdad attacks

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11724378




I love my country and Bernanke, and don't want him to be impeached. Hopefully, we will see "Sanity".




Time to begin the Chairman impeachment proceedings.


By Monty Pelerin
The day after the election, the Federal Reserve launched QE2, the second round of Quantitative Easing. This public relations euphemism attempts to hide the fact that the Fed is "printing money" (the Fed actually does it electronically these days). "Cheating, debasing and inflating," as in stealing from the public, is a more accurate description.

Bernanke indicated from 600 to 850 billion additional dollars would be created. To put this in perspective, the Tarp package was in this range. The total Federal Reserve balance sheet was $829 billion at the end of 2004 and only $869 billion in August 2007. At the end of 2009 it had ballooned to over $2,200 billion. This announcement means it is headed to $3,000 billion (3 trillion).

Ben Bernanke weakly defended his action with the following justifications:
  • ... further support to the economy is needed
  • Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth.
  • higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/bernankes_cowardice_has_sealed.html


Palin Tells Bernanke to 'Cease and Desist' on Easing

09 Nov 2010 | 04:38 AM ET Thomson Reuters

Tea Party favorite Sarah Palin on Monday weighed in on the global debate over the Federal Reserve's $600 billion plan to buy up government debt, suggesting Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke should "cease and desist."

"We shouldn't be playing around with inflation," Palin, who is widely seen as a prospective 2012 Republican presidential candidate, said in remarks prepared for a Monday speech in Phoenix.

"We don't want temporary, artificial economic growth bought at the expense of permanently higher inflation, which will erode the value of our incomes and our savings. We want a stable dollar combined with real economic reform. It's the only way we can get our economy back on the right track."

Excerpts of the remarks were published online by the conservative National Review magazine. Palin's staff was not immediately available for comment.

The report said the remarks would be delivered in a keynote address at a trade association convention.

Palin, the former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, is a top Republican Party figure and leader of the Tea Party movement, which helped Republicans recapture control of the U.S. House of Representatives last week.

Fed Audits, Abolition?

The loosely organized political network includes conservatives and libertarians, some of whom would like to abolish the Federal Reserve system, which operates independent of the federal government.

Voter outrage over Fed bailouts and other actions helped propel many Republican candidates on Election Day, including Kentucky Senator-elect Rand Paul, who has favored abolition of the agency.

His father, House Republican Ron Paul, another Tea Party favorite who has run for president twice, intends to push to audit Fed monetary policy decisions next year if - as expected - he wins control of a congressional subcommittee that oversees the central banks.

Representative Paul Ryan, expected to become chairman of the House Budget Committee when Republicans take control of the chamber in January, said on Sunday the advantages of the central bank's move to inject more money into the U.S. economy "are very low."

"I think it's going to give us a big inflation problem down the road," Ryan said.

President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials defend the Fed's decision to buy $600 billion in U.S. Treasury debt as a means to stimulate the economy and maintain global stability.

Palin's remarks add her to to a growing list of critics, including officials from China, Germany and Brazil, who are concerned that the Fed plan could bring instability instead.

"If it doesn't work, what do we do then? Print even more money? What's the end game here?," she asked. "All this pump priming will come at a serious price."

She appeared to align herself with recent criticism from German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble.

"The German finance minister called the Fed's proposals 'clueless.' When Germany, a country that knows a thing or two about the dangers of inflation, warns us to think again, maybe it's time for Chairman Bernanke to cease and desist," Palin said.

Palin has not said whether she will make a White House bid in 2012. But she has been using public appearances to build up her political and policy credentials for the job.







Did you see this video? It says how WW I got started - JPM show drama start stamp 25 ~



Tax cut for the top 3% rich?
It's disappointment that Americans have to deal with the 3% high income tax cut.

The bottomline is that:

1) Americans are defrauded,
2) Politicians are puppets,
3) Don't trust what politicians or media is saying,
4) Always check on other side of any stories being hyped
5) Millions of Americans' unemployment payment being expired as of 11/30/2010,
6) Most of Republicans-Democrats are defrauding Americans,
7) Republicans are fighting over Bush tax-cut -- working for rich 3% to get tax-cut,
8) USA is going bankrupt while politicians and the Fed Reserve is spinning stories, etc -- Americans and all must see realities.


BUSH BOOK NIGHTMARE -- he is not going to fool me again!

The Republican Tax-cut and the Bush new book could be prelude of the Republican-Bush nightmare.

As for praying for America and Americans as well as all around the globe - as a Christian, I was praying for my country and all, but evidently millions of Americans are completely fooled. It's was the Bush alert which I responded in July 2004 -- and ever since then, I am having Nightmare after Nightmare -- deception after deception. Almost all which I believed was deception and fraud and it seems that Bush is trying to fool Americans again.

Most of Americans are still being fooled and naive about realities.

I AM NOT GOING TO BE FOOLED AGAIN!





Bush's 14 Decision Points

Despite former President Bush's decision to appear in selected venues of the media circuit to promote his apologia, I still stand by my judgment.

Among President Bush's many bad decisions I would list the following fourteen, in my opinion as a presidential biographer and historian, to have been his most egregious, both in getting to the White House, and then as Caesar of the United States:

1. Bush's decision in 1999 to leave the Texas governor's mansion and pursue the U.S. presidency -- a post he knew, in his heart of hearts, he did not have the intellect, qualifications, or qualities of character to occupy successfully. Even his own wife begged him not to do it.
2. Bush's use of Karl Rove and the "dirty tricks brigade" to destroy his Republican rival, Senator McCain in the 2000 primaries -- just as he had, together with Lee Atwater, destroyed Governor Mike Dukakis' bid for the presidency on behalf of his father, twelve years before.
3. Bush's decision to take Dick Cheney as his vice presidential nominee -- an ambitious apparatchik who had, in running the selection process for the VP position, damned all other contenders.
4. Bush's decision to abandon peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, and concentrate on war in the Middle East, instead. ("A show of strength by one side can really clarify things.")
5. Bush's decision to make Karl Rove his Presidential Adviser, with no less than four Political Offices on the second floor of the White House -- further polarizing the country.
6. Bush's decision to demote his inherited Counterterrorism Czar, Richard Clarke, and rely on his inexperienced National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, in the months before 9/11, despite more and more evidence pointing to an imminent attack on the U.S.
7. Bush's subsequent decision to call for a general "war on terror," rather than targeted pursuit and destruction of those responsible for 9/11 -- dubbing his response a "crusade."
8. Bush's decision to invade and occupy the whole of Afghanistan -- without seizing the head of Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden.
9. Bush's decision to then attack and occupy Iraq, without evidence of WMD, and against the advice of his own Secretary of State, General Colin Powell.
10. Bush's decision to disband the Iraqi army and declare "Mission Accomplished" -- leaving the very country that the U.S. had invaded prey to civil, ethnic and religious war.
11. Bush's decision to pursue a policy of secrecy and deceit, and ignore those members of the Justice Department who called for accountability in dealing with suspects -- recklessly sullying America's reputation in the free world to satisfy Vice President Cheney, who became a law unto himself -- unaccountable to anyone.
12. Bush's decision to authorize the virtual assassination of his rival in the 2004 presidential election, the courageous and combat-decorated Senator John Kerry - just as McCain and Dukakis had been trashed by his team, only this time hiding behind "Swift Boats For Truth."
13. Bush's decision to appoint a director of the Arabian Horse Federation as his FEMA chief, his complete failure to federalize the response to the catastrophic effects of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and his congratulation of Michael Brown for doing "a heck of a job" on the people of New Orleans and Louisiana.
14. Bush's decision to pursue policies of minimal Wall Street regulation, lower tax for the rich, zero interest in the Kyoto protocols, the growing national deficit - and an almost complete absence of preparation or response to the housing crisis, derivatives trading and collapse of Wall Street which came on his watch.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nigel-hamilton/bushs-14-decision-points_b_780505.html



http://oi52.tinypic.com/124ht0g.jpg

The bottomline is that:

1) Americans are defrauded,
2) Politicians are puppets,
3) Don't trust what politicians or media is saying,
4) Always check on other side of any stories being hyped
5) Millions of Americans' unemployment payment being expired as of 11/30/2010,
6) Most of Republicans-Democrats are defrauding Americans,
7) Republicans are fighting over Bush tax-cut -- working for rich 3% to get tax-cut,
8) USA is going bankrupt while politicians and the Fed Reserve is spinning stories, etc -- Americans and all must see realities.



* Bankrupted most of major nations, western Christian nations, around the globe while Fed Reserve having multi-trillions.

* 0.1% owns 99% American wealth

• 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are in the hands of 1 percent of the people.

• 61 percent of Americans "always or usually" live paycheck to paycheck, which was up from 49 percent in 2008 and 43 percent in 2007.

• 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans.

• 36 percent of Americans say that they don't contribute anything to retirement savings.

• A staggering 43 percent of Americans have less than $10,000 saved up for retirement.

• 24 percent of American workers say that they have postponed their planned retirement age in the past year.

• Over 1.4 million Americans filed for personal bankruptcy in 2009, which represented a 32 percent increase over 2008.

• Only the top 5 percent of U.S. households have earned enough additional income to match the rise in housing costs since 1975.

• For the first time in U.S. history, banks own a greater share of residential housing net worth in the United States than all individual Americans put together.

• In 1950, the ratio of the average executive's paycheck to the average worker's paycheck was about 30 to 1. Since the year 2000, that ratio has exploded to between 300 to 500 to one.

• As of 2007, the bottom 80 percent of American households held about 7% of the liquid financial assets.

• The bottom 50 percent of income earners in the United States now collectively own less than 1 percent of the nation’s wealth.

• Average Wall Street bonuses for 2009 were up 17 percent when compared with 2008.

• The top 1 percent of U.S. households own nearly twice as much of America's corporate wealth as they did just 15 years ago.

• In America today, the average time needed to find a job has risen to a record 35.2 weeks.

• More than 40 percent of Americans who actually are employed are now working in service jobs, which are often very low paying.

• or the first time in U.S. history, more than 40 million Americans are on food stamps, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture projects that number will go up to 43 million Americans in 2011.

• Approximately 21 percent of all children in the United States are living below the poverty line in 2010 - the highest rate in 20 years.



Americans elected Republican congress because our nation has problems of high deficit, constitutional issues, greed, fraud, etc; but they do not get the message.

It is American Nightmare. 3% wealthy Americans didn't elect nearly 60 Republican congressional members over Democrats.

Rep. Issa Opposes Compromise on Bush Tax Cuts

Rep. Darrell Issa, a California Republican, says he'll oppose any compromise that fails to make permanent Bush-era tax cuts for the most wealthy Americans.

Issa, in line to head the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said Monday on ABC's "Good Morning America" that "tax certainty" is probably more important for investors than for other Americans, to give them incentives to make investments that create jobs.

President Barack Obama says the Bush tax cuts, which are to expire in January, should be made permanent for middle-class Americans. But he says it would be unfair to extend them to America's wealthiest because they don't need the money and taxpayers would have to borrow $700 billion to pay the tab.




http://s5.tinypic.com/15zmdcg_th.jpg